Project agreement health check
Self-check the contract gaps that create unpaid work: revisions, payment, scope, change orders, review windows, and IP.
Educational self-check, not Zlaip’s in-product Agreement Health™ score.
Higher risk
0% Health
- • Strengthen: Revision boundary (included rounds) is written
- • Strengthen: Payment triggers / schedule are explicit
- • Strengthen: Scope / deliverables are specific enough to refuse extras
- • Strengthen: Change-order path is defined
- • Strengthen: Client review window (business days) is set
- • Strengthen: IP / ownership language is present
Want more playbooks like this?
Tell us you are interested. We only record that you used this tool — no inbox signup here.
Educational only, not Zlaip’s in-product Agreement Health™ score from contract analysis.
What “healthy” means here
A healthy agreement makes it obvious what is included, how revisions work, when payment releases, and how scope expands. Missing any of those invites free work.
Live scoring in Zlaip
In product, Agreement Health™ comes from analyzed contract risk, not this checklist. Use this page to prepare, then upload or compose terms in Zlaip for a real score.
Common questions
- Is this Agreement Health™?
- No. This is a self-assessment. In-product health is computed from clause analysis.
- What if my score is low?
- Strengthen the missing items, then create a Simple project with clearer boundaries.
- Do I need a lawyer?
- This tool is educational, not legal advice. Use counsel for high-stakes agreements.
- Fastest fix?
- Write a revision boundary and change-order path. Then enforce them in chat.
Ready for live accountability?
Create a Simple project in minutes. Set boundaries, review requests, and lock approvals without building an agency workspace first.